Sunday, January 28, 2007

Ma'am, Sir, and the Southern Gentleman


The notion of the “Southern gentleman” is one that has long been associated with men from the South. What is the Southern gentleman? Today, most of us probably think of a Southern gentleman as someone with good manners and a Southern accent. Maybe you think of someone who looks like Tom Wolfe, dressed in white suits with a mint julep in his hand. I’ve never really gone any farther than that in my thinking of the Southern gentleman. I call people older than me who I respect Sir and Ma'am. When I first moved to New York, I had teachers and parents who thought I was being sarcastic with them (I wasn't, most of the time). Many of my friends parents say it makes them feel old, when it really is just a way for me to show respect to them. Good manners are really what I mainly associated with the Southern Gentleman before these readings. However, both Fitzhugh, in “Southern Thought” and Kennedy, in Swallow Barn go much farther in their generalizations of Southern men and Southern thought.


Fitzhugh obviously feels that the South is superior in every way to any other place in the world. This does not have to do with where these people are geographically located, but how they think. “Southerners have always shown themselves the equals, generally the superiors, of the first intellects of the world…no men have the strength of will that Southerners possess. We are accustomed to command from our cradle. To command becomes a want and a necessity of our nature, and this begets that noble strength of will that nerves the mind for intellectual conflict and intellectual exertion, just as it nerves the body for physical contest. We are sure to write well, because we shall write boldly, fearlessly, and energetically.” To summarize, Southerners are smarter, stronger (in body and in mind), natural born leaders, and the best writers because they ain’t scared to say what they mean and damn anyone who disagrees with them. These are some pretty bold statements by Fitzhugh. While they are nice to think about (especially for someone from the South), they are based wholly on Fitzhugh’s lofty opinion of the South and not on any concrete evidence. Still though, many people in the south still feel this way. “American by birth, Southern by the grace of God” is a common bumper sticker and saying that is commonly seen and heard throughout the South.

Kennedy takes a different approach is his description (upon description, upon description) in Swallow Barn of Frank Meriwether, who serves as a Kennedy’s stereotypical Southern gentleman. “He has a great suavity of manners, and a genuine benevolence of disposition….” (64) Kennedy writes this under the pseudonym Mark Littleton, “a genial but canny New Yorker whose unfamiliarity with Virginia plantation society let Kennedy describe this world with a mix of amused detachment and affectionate curiosity.” (59) Kennedy uses Frank Meriwether to manifest all the stereotypical traits people associate with a Southern gentleman—he is well-dressed (to the point of being showy), popular, a good-citizen, long-winded, opinionated, and has a complacent, go-with-the-flow attitude about him. I don’t know if everyone in the class would agree, but these are fundamental things I think of when I think of the notion of a southern Gentleman. He is even nice to his slaves.

Fitzhugh uses the idea of the Southern gentleman to emphasize his point that Southern thought is superior to thought anywhere else in the world, thus giving his own writing and opinions more validity (in his mind and in the minds of many other Southerners). Clearly he feels more strongly and militant in this notion than Kennedy, who uses Meriwether as an icon, a hyperbole of a typical Southern gentleman, well-off on his plantation. Kennedy is not using this to portray a strong conviction like Fitzhugh. I don’t know if it was writer’s goals to sell books back then (I suspect not so much), but if I was to read it today I would say he made this character up because he thought people would enjoy reading about this stereotypical Southern male and buy his book. All I know is behind all the stereotypes of Southerners as ignorant, racist rednecks, there lays a very flattering notion of what a man from the South is, and leaves all Southerners struggling to embody these ideals.





Friday, January 19, 2007

John Smith and Jesus-Fishers of Men?

I had a thought in class today that I want to discuss in my first blog entry. We were asked why we thought Smith included a seemingly random passage about fishing towards the end of the reading "A Description of New England," and we all concluded it was a metaphor. Some saw it as a metaphor for the abundance of possibilities in the New World, and I agree with that assessment. However, any time I see a fishing metaphor it is impossible for me to not think about Christian symbolism. Many biblical stories involve fishing, including Jesus miraculously calming a storm from a boat (Matthew 8:23-26), having his disciples catch so much fish their nets were overflowing (John 21:1-14), and paying His and Peter's taxes with a coin taken from inside a fish (Matthew 17:27). The closest passage from the Bible I can compare to Smith's writing is from Matthew 4:19 "'Come, follow me,' Jesus said, 'and I will make you fishers of men.'" This is, in his own words, Smith's message to Englishmen. His whole passage is an advertisement to his fellow countrymen to follow him to the New World. He even calls on their religious duty and faith in his attempts to convince them to come: "If he have but the taste of virtue...what to such a mind can bee more pleasant, than...building a a foundation for his Posterite, gotte from the rude earth, by God's blessing and his own industrie...?If hee have any graine of faith or zeale in Religion, what can hee doe lesse hurtfull to any; or more agreeable to God, then to seeke to convert those poore Salvages to know Christ, and humanitie, whose labors with discretion will triple requite thy charges and paines?" (15) Smith is saying good Christians have a responsibility to do good unto others and to spread the Word of God by opening the "Salvages" eyes to the Lord and civilization, as defined by Europe.

While John Smith clearly thinks quite highly of himself and comes off as quite a braggart in both of the readings, I don't think he is blasphemous enough to think of himself as a Jesus-like figure, although that would make for an interesting discussion. In 1616, most Europeans were extremely devout and put all of their faith in their religion. Smith is using Christian principles to encourage men and women to go to the New World and do God's work. I do think that Smith saw himself as a "fisher of men" in trying to recruit colonizers, and perhaps he really thought he was doing God's work, but mostly I think he just wanted some help in etching his name in history.

(I consulted http://www.keyway.ca/htm2002/fisher.htm for some help in locating passages from The Bible about fishing.)